Supreme court justice breyer biography books

Judith Richards Hope. Breyer Foreword. Kathleen M. Sullivan Afterword. Richard B. Stewart. Breyer. Cass R. Sunstein. Adrian Vermeule. Kennedy. Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Sonia Sotomayor. Samuel Alito Concurrence. Clarence Thomas Dissent. Breyer editor. Robert Badinter Editor. Christine Luchok Fallon Contributor. Samuel Alito Dissent. Get a FREE ebook by joining our mailing list today!

Must redeem within 90 days. See full terms and conditions and this month's choices. You may also like: Thriller and Mystery Staff Picks. More to Explore. Limited Time eBook Deals Check out this month's discounted reads. Our Summer Reading Recommendations Red-hot romances, poolside fiction, and blockbuster picks, oh my! This Month's New Releases From heart-pounding thrillers to poignant memoirs and everything in between, check out what's new this month.

Michigan Bar Journal. Chapman Law Review. April 23, Archived from the original PDF on January 26, Archived from the original on March 2, Sierra Club. October 21, Archived from the original on January 21, July 31, Archived from the original PDF on March 9, March 4, Archived from the original on April 14, Archived from the original on March 5, June 25, Archived from the original on June 29, Retrieved June 25, June 17, Archived PDF from the original on June 17, Retrieved June 17, April 28, Archived from the original PDF on May 8, Common Cause et al" PDF.

Archived from the original PDF on February 15, March 25, Retrieved March 1, April 6, October 26, Archived from the original PDF on February 23, July 1, Archived PDF from the original on July 6, Retrieved September 6, Archived from the original on April 18, Archived from the original on August 31, Retrieved September 5, Archived from the original on September 12, Retrieved September 12, The Wall Street Journal.

Retrieved February 25, Texas Department of Public Safety, U. Archived from the original on October 17, Retrieved October 17, Chambers of Justice Stephen Breyer. USA Today. Archived from the original on April 15, Retrieved October 9, July 2, Retrieved January 7, Bloomberg Law. January 8, May The Yale Law Journal. JSTOR S2CID Archived PDF from the supreme court justice breyer biography books on July 4, Breyer thinks that, as compared with a single-minded focus on literal text, his approach will tend to make the law more sensible, almost by definition.

He also contends that it 'helps to implement the public's will and is therefore consistent with the Constitution's democratic purpose. Law is tied to life, and a failure to understand how a statute is so tied can undermine the very human activity that the law seeks to benefit. The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 14, Retrieved September 15, AU Washington College of Law.

January 13, Archived from the original on April 4, American Prospect Online. Retrieved October 6, SimmonsU. TexasU. VirginiaU. Archived from the original on March 7, Retrieved March 23, WashingtonU. February 5, Archived from the original on December 29, Archived from the original on March 3, Retrieved March 19, September 30, Archived from the original on February 14, The Boston Globe.

Retrieved December 26, Archived PDF from the original on November 28, Retrieved October 26, Justice Breyer explains his Constitution". National Review. Archived from the original on March 18, Retrieved October 31, Archived from the original on November 6, Retrieved October 8, Capital Hilton Ballroom — Washington, D. Archived from the original on August 25, Penguin Random House.

Retrieved October 27, March 26, Retrieved March 27, December 12, Archived from the original on May 13, Retrieved April 2, Daily News. Archived from the original on January 31, Retrieved December 13, Archived from the original on December 3, Archived from the original on June 9, Retrieved June 9, Scouting November — December : Retrieved November 1, Architect Magazine.

August 16, Archived from the original on May 15, Retrieved March 5, The Week. Archived from the original on September 18, Retrieved September 18, Retrieved September 19, Collins, Ronald February 28, Concurring Opinions Blog. Stephen Breyer at Wikipedia's sister projects. Levin H. Juan R. Harry Blackmun. Ketanji Brown Jackson. Scott Bessent. How do you think of Proust?

He has an enormous talent for building characters and bringing a world to life. In his descriptions of his own experiences you see the role of art in life. Art is not separate from life, it is an element of life. We all have the need and the capacity to impose form upon the flux around us. Now, we can impose a better form or we can impose a worse form.

Yet we can try to clarify our thoughts and remember the importance of form when we write. You cited Proust and Camus in the original French and you advise those interested in law to learn another language. Why is mastering another language so valuable in your view? I have spent a lot of time with French. I try. But worth it, for the same reason I recommend reading literature.

Supreme court justice breyer biography books

We have only one life, each of us. Through literature and language we can begin to understand the lives of other people and get insight into how others see the world. By reading some French books as originally written, I think I gain a better view of a world that is seen by many people who speak French, which I would be cut off from otherwise because translation is different.

So language, like literature, opens windows. The job of being a judge entails spending every day alone in a room with books and a word processor. Yet the words that you write affect other people. Only the most difficult cases get to the Supreme Court, those cases where perfectly good judges come to different conclusions on the meaning of the same words.

In those difficult cases, it is very important to imaginatively understand how other people live and how your decisions might affect them, so you can take that into account when you write. You are transparent about your jurisprudence in Making Our Democracy Work. Please characterise your approach. Judges have the job of trying to work out what the words written down in a statute actually mean.

We have six traditional ways of approaching this job. First, we read the words. Second, we look to the tradition. Third, we look to the history of the case. Fourth, we look to precedent — what has been said about this in previous cases? Fifth, we look to purposes — somebody wrote this statute, what did they have in mind and what were they trying to accomplish with these words?

And sixth, we look to consequences. Everybody uses those six tools: Text, tradition, history, precedent, purpose and consequence. Five Books interviews are expensive to produce. If you're enjoying this interview, please support us by donating a small amount. Some judges tend to emphasise purposes and consequences. I often cannot get the answer from the first four things, so I look to purpose — what did the authors of the bill mean?

What were they trying to accomplish? They try to find the answer in history, text, language and tradition — the first four. That explains differences among the judges. They believe they can find answers in those four factors more often. All of us, including me, agree that you have to look back to find out the primary value that underlies the provision of the constitution.